Closing Argument

A trial lawyer's commentary on his practice, developments in the law, and occasionally, life in general.

Name:

I hope you enjoy my blog. I am a trial attorney with offices at 100 West Monroe, Suite 1900, Chicago, Illinois. A large portion of my practice involves the representation of persons who have been injured due to auto accidents, work accidents or medical malpractice. In addition, I also also represent a select number of clients with business, commercial or employment disputes. If you wish to talk to me about a case, please contact me at my office, 312/346-3715 or email me at markploftus@aol.com

Saturday, August 21, 2004

NO DUTY TO HAVE DEFIBRILLATOR ON PREMISES

Couple of cases I've seen in the last couple of weeks that merit comment.

In Salte v. YMCA, the Second District Appellate Court of Illinois faced the question of whether a health club has a duty to have defibrillators on site for emergencies. Terry Salte was exercising at a YMCA health club on one of the treadmills. The YMCA employed a paramedic who was on duty that day, a couple of machines over, helping another member. Salte suffered cardiac arrest while on the treadmill. It isn't clear what steps the paramedic took to assist him prior to the arrival of county paramedics, but because the YMCA did not have a defibrillator on site, no such device was used. The plaintiff alleged that the YMCA had a duty to equip their paramedic personnel with such a device, and their failure to do so caused him significant physical damage. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss which was granted by the trial court. The plaintiff appealed but didn't get any relief. The Appellate Court first noted that typically in Illinois, one has no duty to rescue an injured stranger if that person hadn't caused the injury. The opinion went on however, to recognize some exceptions to that rule, including those situations where a legitimate business customer is injured on business premises. So the Court did conclude the YMCA had a duty to render first aid to Salte. But the Court found that that's where their duty ended. The Appellate Court explictly found that the YMCA did not have a duty to have a defibrillator on its premises or to use it on plaintiff. The lower court's ruling was upheld.

NO BREAK FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED PEDESTRIAN

In another case[that has implications for at least one of my cases], a visually impaired pedestrian was injured due to a sidewalk defect as she walked down the street. The case is Postran v. City of Chicago. Ms. Postran was walking to her bus stop one day and saw that some repairs were being done on the sidewalk she intended to walk over, where it met with the alley. She noticed the work when she was 4-5 sidewalk squares away. The repairs, by her own admission, were significant - with a couple of sidewalk squares dug up, and the resulting trench at least 6 inches deep. She noticed all that before she arrived at the area of the repairs. Nonetheless, she tried to walk over the area, fell and suffered a wrist injury. She sued the City and the City asked the trial court to toss the case based on the "open and obvious doctrine". That doctrine basically says that landowners are not required to protect against injuries from conditions that are open and obvious. The courts have defined the "open and obvious" phrase to mean conditions that would be recognized by a reasonable person. Plaintiff, who recognized there were problems with the open and obvious issue, tried to skirt them by offering testimony about her visual disability. She testified that she had been blind in her left eye for nearly 40 years and had visual problems in the right eye as well. The trial court nonetheless threw the case out. And plaintiff appealed. On appeal the plaintiff argued that the City was required to prove that the dangerous condition was open and obvious to a person with similar disabilities - i.e. someone who doesn't see well. The Appellate Court didn't quite agree and noted that when a person is under a disability, like bad vision, they will be held to the standard of a reasonable person with a similar disability. The Court went on to find that the condition of the sidewalk, and the risk of walking on it, were obvious and would have been recognized by either a person with perfect eyesight or poor eyesight. The Court ruled that even assuming the plaintiff had difficulty seeing, the defect was still open and obvious. The court also found that the plaintiff couldn't rely on the exception to the open and obvious rule[which I wouldn't discuss]. The lower court's ruling was upheld.

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

And on a lighter note than pure instant trial , check out the funniest trial transcript ever! If it's not serious enough of a topic, well, just pretend it's the Brit's version of instant trial !

November 6, 2005 at 8:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's a good post, for sure, but make sure you are prepared for anything by checking out automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator . The The Philips Heartstart Defibrillator could save your life.

November 7, 2005 at 1:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That sounds great, but I've seen very different opinions of aed in schools

November 18, 2005 at 4:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your site was so interesting and informative I had to call a friend to tell her about it. Great work
nda pharmacy
diet fat smash
rascal scooter
teen sex movie
http://free-paris-hilton-video.just2buy.com free paris hilton video
avery label
kimbo fight video
kay jewelry
scooter for sale
pokemon crater
rifle stock
mature woman
http://aafes-exchange.just2buy.com aafes exchange
scooter yamaha
motorized scooter

December 10, 2006 at 10:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hi people happy new year!!!!!!!!!!!
item
promotional

forex training
charlotte
north carolina real estate

victorias secret credit card

December 31, 2006 at 1:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have you taken the right vitamin lately? Is your body answering that question right now? Shocking truth about why this whole food vitamin has set a new standard! This can improve your quality of life.

February 3, 2007 at 2:06 PM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

babyliss pro, soccer jerseys, canada goose outlet, herve leger, birkin bag, lululemon outlet, bottega veneta, asics shoes, insanity workout, moncler, roshe run, ugg, jimmy choo shoes, ugg outlet, ferragamo shoes, canada goose outlet, canada goose uk, wedding dresses, canada goose, giuseppe zanotti, mac cosmetics, p90x workout, ugg soldes, uggs outlet, canada goose pas cher, new balance outlet, north face jackets, valentino shoes, instyler ionic styler, rolex watches, canada goose outlet, ghd, abercrombie and fitch, mcm handbags, beats headphones, soccer shoes, uggs on sale, moncler, reebok outlet, nfl jerseys, mont blanc pens, marc jacobs outlet, north face outlet, ugg boots, vans outlet, hollister, moncler, moncler outlet, chi flat iron, celine handbags

October 19, 2014 at 7:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

ninest123 16.03
tory burch outlet, ugg boots, tiffany jewelry, prada handbags, louis vuitton outlet, louis vuitton, ray ban sunglasses, michael kors outlet, cheap oakley sunglasses, oakley sunglasses, louboutin, nike air max, nike air max, louis vuitton, jordan shoes, michael kors outlet, nike free, polo ralph lauren outlet, ray ban sunglasses, louis vuitton outlet, burberry, longchamp, ray ban sunglasses, gucci outlet, louboutin shoes, oakley sunglasses, ugg boots, louboutin outlet, tiffany and co, chanel handbags, oakley sunglasses, oakley sunglasses, prada outlet, ugg boots, polo ralph lauren outlet, michael kors outlet, michael kors outlet, michael kors outlet, ugg boots, replica watches, longchamp outlet, burberry outlet online, longchamp outlet, louis vuitton, christian louboutin outlet, replica watches, nike outlet, michael kors, uggs on sale

March 13, 2016 at 9:44 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home